What is the Impact of Vial Size on Chromatography Results?

Chromatography is a widely used technique in analytical chemistry, biochemistry, and a variety of fields to separate and analyze components in a mixture. A critical aspect of chromatography that is often overlooked is the size of the vial used to hold the sample. The choice of vial size can significantly impact the accuracy, reproducibility, and overall quality of chromatographic results. This article explores the various effects of vial size on chromatography, focusing on sample size considerations, headspace effects, contamination risk, and compatibility with analytical techniques.
 

Sample Volume Considerations

The volume of the sample being analyzed is one of the primary factors influencing the choice of vial size. Chromatography vials are available in various sizes, typically ranging from micro vials (0.3 mL) to standard sizes (1.5 mL and 2 mL) .

Micro Vials: These are ideal for small sample volumes and are commonly used in high-sensitivity applications such as High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Gas Chromatography (GC). Their smaller size minimizes waste and allows for precise analysis when sample availability is limited.

Standard Vials: Larger vials accommodate bigger sample volumes but can lead to issues if not properly matched to the sample size. Excessive headspace can result in evaporation or degradation of volatile compounds, leading to inaccurate results.

Choosing a vial that closely matches the required sample volume ensures that the chromatography process operates efficiently while maintaining sample integrity.

Want to know why glass chromatography vials are better than plastic vials,please check this article: Top 3 Reasons Why Glass Chromatography Vials are Better Than Plastic Vials

Headspace Effects

Headspace refers to the space within a vial above the liquid sample. An appropriate headspace is crucial for maintaining consistent conditions during analysis.

Evaporation Risks: If a vial has too much headspace relative to the sample volume, volatile components may evaporate, altering concentration levels and compromising results. This is particularly relevant in GC applications where volatile compounds are analyzed.

Injection Consistency: Inconsistent injection volumes can arise from improper headspace management. Ensuring that the vial size is suitable for the sample volume helps maintain a stable environment within the vial, resulting in more reproducible injections .

Contamination Risks

The material and size of chromatography vials also influence contamination risks. Different materials exhibit varying levels of interaction with samples.

Material Selection: Glass vials are generally preferred due to their inert properties, which reduce contamination risks from leaching substances. However, plastic vials may be suitable for specific applications, such as PFAS testing . The choice of material should align with the chemical nature of the analytes being tested.

Surface Interactions: Proteins and nucleic acids can adsorb onto glass surfaces, leading to reduced recovery rates and method robustness . For instance, hydrophobic proteins may form salt adducts with glass over time, complicating analyses. To mitigate these issues, specialized low adsorption glass vials or polypropylene vials designed for sensitive biomolecules are recommended.

Compatibility with Analytical Techniques

Different chromatography techniques may require specific vial sizes and types to ensure optimal performance.

HPLC and GC Requirements: Vial closure styles (screw caps vs. crimp tops) can significantly affect sealing integrity during analysis. Crimp caps are often used in GC vials to securely seal volatile compounds, while screw caps may be more appropriate for HPLC applications where ease of access is necessary .